December 9, 2009 by David Sung

Final Thoughts on Dan Breznitz’s “Atl Startup Scene”

As many of you know, Prof Dan Breznitz from Georgia Tech, recently published a research paper on Atlanta based start-ups over the last decade.   He covered topics such as venture capital, community support, cross pollination of companies, and the migration of home grown start-ups out of our region. Much of his findings are not suprising.  Yes, we all know there is a dearth of venture firms in the southeast and yes, there are a number of cases of start-ups moving to what appears to be greener pastures.  On the surface, I can understand why one can reach these conclusions.  After all, Atlanta is no Silicon Valley.

Then I started thinking about my time here in Atlanta, can’t believe it’s nearly been a decade.  You see, I’m a transplant from Boston.  Plucked directly out of the number two entrepreneurial region in the country, at it’s height. I guess I can argue I’m one of the few that can really give a fair perspective on the Atlanta startup community and how it compares to other areas in the country.  I lived and breathed the start-up scene both in Atlanta and Boston.  The key ingredients to a successful start-up region are:

- great technology university/universities

- talented resources (developers/business entrepreneurs)

- available funding

- supportive entreprenurial community

- local acquiring companies

If you compare Silicon Valley/Boston to Atlanta I believe you’ll find only one major difference, local acquiring companies.  Atlanta has a great technology university in Georgia Tech, talented resources (we’re home to more fortune 500 companies than almost any other region), funding has always been available for the right deal (in or out of town money), and great support system (there are entrepreneurial networking events going on every week, ATDC, Startup Riot, Startup Gauntlet, Open Coffees, ATA “So You Think You Can Pitch, Shotput Ventures, GRA/TAG Business Launch, Startup Chicks, Startup Lounge, Venture Atlanta, and the list goes on).

Look back ten years at all press releases on technology acquisitions in the US, you’ll find 90+% are by companies based out of Silicon Valley or Boston and that the acquired company is local to that area.  We’ve had our chance with companies such as ISS and Scientific Atlanta.  They could have opened the flood gates to this area with security and video acquisitions.  A few years ago, I counted we had upwards of thirty security start-ups in Atlanta.  ISS and SA have since been acquired themselves by IBM and Cisco.  Hopefully, they develop an appetite for acquiring local companies.  In addition, companies such as Cox and Time Warner/Turner could be prime as well buying companies in the internet and media space.  Once local acquisitions occur by local companies, local venture capital will return. Venture capitalists prefer investing in their backyard. They also know acquiring companies only buy in their own backyard (minimizing integration risk).

The most important thing we all can do in fostering start-up growth in Atlanta is plug in our local technology Fortune 500 companies into the start-up scene.  In nurturing this most important relationship, we could find  this to be the single most catalyzing event for Atlanta.   It’ll take some time and education.  After all, Silicon Valley was no Silicon Valley twenty years ago.

Comments

So my final thoughts on your final thoughts.

I think that the study has a flawed conclusion that factor availability is fully satisfied in Atlanta. Based on what I have seen, and what the panelists at the recent ATDC/TAG Entrepreneurs Society event discussed, there is a lack of funding factor in Atlanta. In my view, and in complete agreement with stance, technology startups/companies leave Atlanta, either by literally moving for a funding event or a change in corporate HQ after an acquisition, due to a lack of those alternatives being in Atlanta.

Lance Weatherby on December 9th, 2009

David,
Agree with you on all point accept the community support. Its definitely there, but its new and raw. Most of the organizations you mentioned were founded in the last couple of years. It will take a few years time before they become ‘house-hold’ names and draw a larger re-occurring crowd of attendants that will become better in vocally supporting the community.

I have no doubt in my mind that Atlanta will be a very relevant player one day! Definitely looking forward to it :)

Vladik on December 9th, 2009

In analytics, it is often more useful to speak of subgroups when a dataset is very big and noisy. Everyone knows Atlanta’s business culture is at odds with startup culture. What is more interesting is to talk about the clusters we have, which reproduce Silicon Valley or Route 128 in nearly every way – lots of funding, lots of acquisitions, lots of talent, chains of successful founders – no broken part of the loop whatsoever. Atlanta is a terrible place to start many kinds of company – but its also a great place to start some kinds of company. What are those clusters, why do they exist, how did they get here and how can they sustain, grow and extend themselves?

That is the conversation I would like to be having.

Russell Jurney on December 10th, 2009

One last thing – we need to be realistic. Silicon Valley was the Radio Bay 100 years ago. It didn’t happen in 20 years. It took 100 years to reach its 2001 peak.

Russell Jurney on December 10th, 2009

Success will breed success. It is just a matter of time. Plus, I personally prefer being removed from the Silicon craze!

Dave Williams on December 13th, 2009

Good post David,

While we can argue about the definition of “the right deal” in your statement “funding has always been available for the right deal”, I have to strongly agree with this statement you made:

“The most important thing we all can do in fostering start-up growth in Atlanta is plug in our local technology Fortune 500 companies into the start-up scene.”

Let’s all work in 2010 and beyond to get the local Fortune 500 companies engaged. I know that will be a big part of Startup Atlanta’s outreach efforts in the coming years.

Mike Schinkel on December 22nd, 2009

We’ve got to back the existing startup clusters we have, cultivate their entrepreneurial ecosystems, and make Atlanta a world class, ‘must be’ place for startups in security, SaaS, finance and telecom.

New clusters are fragile seedlings, and without a strong university partnership and the backing of local government, they cannot thrive, grow and branch into new clusters. The market decides which clusters we get. The state decides whether to ensure their growth.

Russell Jurney on January 2nd, 2010

Post a comment